Skip to main content
OpenTofu delivers a fully open-source, vendor-neutral Terraform fork designed to put users first. In this article, we examine how OpenTofu’s licensing, governance, and architecture empower organizations to scale infrastructure-as-code initiatives without surprise lock-ins or slow feature delivery.

​
Licensing and Governance

OpenTofu is published under the permissive MIT License, ensuring that users retain full freedom to inspect, modify, and distribute the code. In contrast, Terraform is governed by HashiCorp under the Mozilla Public License 2.0, which enforces certain copyleft requirements.
ProjectLicenseGovernance Model
OpenTofuMIT LicenseCommunity-driven with an impartial maintainer team
TerraformMPL 2.0Core development steered by HashiCorp
Terraform’s copyleft license may impose obligations on derivative works, potentially impacting closed-source or enterprise workflows.
Pull requests in OpenTofu are reviewed solely on technical merit, free from corporate influence. A neutral maintainer committee vets every contribution, so enhancements and fixes benefit the broader community.

​
Feature Prioritization

OpenTofu’s feature roadmap is shaped by its contributors. Instead of vendor-driven timelines, priorities emerge from public discussions and GitHub issues:
  • New features are proposed, debated, and triaged in the open.
  • Contributors cast votes via issue reactions, ensuring top-requested items rise to the top.
  • Community meetings and regular working groups keep development aligned with real-world use cases.
Explore the full OpenTofu roadmap and issue tracker to see how you can influence upcoming releases.
This transparent process means major enhancements—such as advanced state management or native support for cloud services—are fast-tracked based on demand.

​
Layered, Modular Architecture

OpenTofu’s codebase is carefully partitioned into distinct layers and modules. This structure makes it straightforward to:
  • Develop new plugins, provisioners, and backends.
  • Navigate the repository and identify extension points.
  • Build a rich ecosystem of complementary tools for Terraform-style workflows.
For example, adding a custom provider follows the same pattern as Terraform: 
terraform {
  required_providers {
    example = {
      source  = "registry.terraform.io/example/provider"
      version = "1.0.0"
    }
  }
}

provider "example" {
  # configuration here
}
This modularity fosters innovation: independent teams can focus on specialized modules without risking cross-cutting changes.
The image is a presentation slide titled "OpenTofu – An Edge Over Terraform," featuring a cube icon and two points highlighting its influence on user choices and its layered, modular design.

Watch Video