Skip to main content
In this lesson, we explore why buildpacks exist, the challenges they address with traditional Dockerfiles, and how they simplify the process of creating container images. We begin by examining how a typical application is containerized using a Dockerfile.

​
Containerizing an Application with Dockerfiles

When containerizing an application, developers typically write a Dockerfile—a sequence of instructions that details how to build the application’s container image. Take, for example, a Node.js application. The following Dockerfile uses a trusted base image, creates a non-root user, sets up the working directory, installs production dependencies, copies the application source code, and finally exposes a port with the command to run the application.
The image illustrates the process of containerizing an application, showing a developer creating a Dockerfile.
# Use Node 20.16-alpine as the base image
FROM node:20.16-alpine3.19 AS base

# Create a user group and user
RUN groupadd -r appgroup && useradd -r -g appgroup appuser

# Set the working directory
WORKDIR /usr/src/app

# Copy the package.json and package-lock.json files
COPY package*.json ./

# Install production dependencies and clean the cache
RUN npm ci --omit=dev && npm cache clean --force

# Copy the entire source code into the container
COPY . .

# Change ownership of the application files
RUN chown -R appuser:appgroup /usr/src/app

# Switch to the non-root user
USER appuser

# Document the port that may need to be published
EXPOSE 5000

# Start the application
CMD ["node", "src/server.js"]
In this Dockerfile, each instruction customizes the base image. Copying the package files ensures that only the necessary dependencies are installed, and switching to a non-root user enhances security. The final command instructs the container on how to start the application.

​
Challenges with Writing and Maintaining Dockerfiles

Designing a Dockerfile is straightforward when using a limited set of commands, but ensuring it adheres to best practices poses several challenges. Many organizations face issues such as:
  • Inconsistent Base Images: Different teams might select various base images, leading to discrepancies.
  • Non-Reproducible Builds: Updates in dependencies or base images can change the resulting build over time.
  • Manual Security Updates: Implementing security patches requires manually updating the base image and rebuilding the entire image.
  • Varied Best Practices: Inconsistent practices across teams can lead to variability in the quality and security of Dockerfiles.
The image highlights the challenges of Dockerfiles, stating that writing a Docker file is easy, but writing a good Docker file is hard.
Many teams produce Dockerfiles that do not fully adhere to recommended best practices such as using trusted base images, avoiding running as the root user, leveraging multi-stage builds to reduce image size, and grouping related instructions into layers.
The image lists four Dockerfile best practices: use trusted base images, don't run as root user, utilize multistage builds to minimize image sizes, and minimize the number of layers.
Within an organization, each team—be it handling authentication, front-end, or back-end—might craft their own Dockerfile, resulting in varying quality and potential security vulnerabilities.
The image illustrates challenges with Dockerfiles, showing an organization divided into Auth, Frontend, and Backend sections, each linked to a corresponding Dockerfile (A, B, C).
Additional challenges include:
  • Variability in base images across teams leading to inconsistency.
  • Triggered image rebuilds due to minor changes in base images.
  • Difficulty in standardizing and reusing base images.
  • Challenges with layer auditing and human error during manual creation.
The image lists challenges associated with Dockerfiles, including issues with base image consistency, non-reproducible builds, manual security updates, and human error risks.

​
Introducing CloudNative Buildpacks

CloudNative Buildpacks provide an automated solution to the challenges posed by Dockerfiles by streamlining the creation of OCI-compliant container images. Instead of manually maintaining Dockerfiles, developers can rely on buildpacks to analyze the application source code, choose the appropriate build process, and generate a container image. Key features of buildpacks include:
  • Language-agnostic support for runtimes such as Java, Ruby, .NET, Node.js, Go, Python, and more.
  • Specific buildpacks for each programming language that detect and containerize the application automatically.
  • A focus on code development while buildpacks manage dependency installation, configuration, and image creation.
To generate a container image with buildpacks, simply run the Pack CLI build command with your preferred image name: 
> pack build myapp
This command builds the container image automatically without needing a Dockerfile, abstracting away the details of dependency installation and configuration, regardless of the runtime.

​
Benefits of Using CloudNative Buildpacks

CloudNative Buildpacks offer significant organizational and operational advantages over traditional Dockerfiles:
BenefitDescription
Standardized Build ProcessEnforces a centralized, best-practice approach across teams for consistent image builds.
Improved SecurityCentralized base images allow rapid security updates and produce detailed bills of materials.
Separation of ResponsibilitiesOperations manage the build process, enabling developers to focus solely on code.
Efficient RebasingOnly the base layer is updated when changes occur, avoiding full rebuilds of all layers.
Optimized Layering and CachingIntelligent grouping of operations into shared layers reduces image size and accelerates deployment.
Layer ReusabilityCommon runtime versions are shared between applications, lowering disk usage and speeding up pulls.
CloudNative Buildpacks are ideal for multi-team environments where consistency and security are paramount.
  • Standardized Build Process: Organizations can enforce centralized policies that benefit all teams, ensuring consistency in container image construction.
The image is a diagram illustrating the benefits of using Buildpacks, showing an organization with policies applied to three teams (A, B, and C), each represented by different colored icons.
  • Improved Security and Auditing: A single standardized base image streamlines security updates. Additionally, buildpacks generate a comprehensive bill of materials that details software versions, checksums, and licenses for easy auditing.
The image illustrates the benefits of using buildpacks, highlighting roles such as the operations team and developers, and tasks like handling security updates and applying best practices.
  • Separation of Responsibilities: The operations team manages the build process, base images, and security policies so that developers can fully concentrate on writing code.
  • Efficient Rebasing: When a base image update—such as a security patch—is necessary, buildpacks allow you to rebase the image efficiently, updating only the required layer.
The image compares the effects of layer changes in Dockerfiles versus Buildpacks, showing that Dockerfiles cause all layers to change, while Buildpacks only change the specific layer, resulting in less data transfer and faster rebuilds.
  • Optimized Layering and Caching: Intelligent grouping allows only the changed layers to rebuild, reducing image size and storage needs. This also speeds up deployments, particularly in Kubernetes environments.
The image illustrates "Layering Efficiency" with a diagram showing three layers: Source Code, App Dependencies, and Base Image. A note indicates that unchanged layers do not need rebuilding.
  • Layer Reusability: When multiple applications use the same runtime, for example, Go v1.13, they share a common layer. This decreases storage usage and accelerates container pulls from registries.
The image illustrates a diagram of shared layers in a software environment, showing an operations team managing base images and different versions of Go and Node software.
Consider a scenario in a Kubernetes node where two applications share the same runtime layer. Instead of downloading duplicate layers, the shared layer is reused, optimizing bandwidth and storage:
The image illustrates a Kubernetes node with two applications, App1 and App2, sharing a Go v1.13 layer, and references Docker Hub.

​
Summary

CloudNative Buildpacks streamline the container image creation process while addressing many limitations of traditional Dockerfiles. The major benefits include:
  • Automated build processes and dependency management.
  • Consistent and rigorous adherence to best practices across development teams.
  • Centralized management of base images and security updates by the operations team.
  • Generation of detailed bills of materials for thorough auditing.
  • Efficient rebasing that updates only modified layers, saving time.
  • Optimized and reusable layers that reduce resource consumption and accelerate deployment.
  • Support for multiple languages and frameworks, making them a versatile solution for diverse technology stacks.
Adopting CloudNative Buildpacks allows organizations to achieve secure, consistent, and efficient container image creation, freeing developers to focus on producing high-quality code while operations handle the build and deployment workflows.
To further explore containerization best practices, consider visiting the Kubernetes Documentation and Docker Hub.

Watch Video